Five steps to take if someone bad-mouths your business
By Amanda Hamilton, CEO of NALP
For a small business, reviews can be crucial for attracting new customers, and most consumers now utilise reviews and ratings to give them guidance on whether or not to use the services or products on offer.
But what happens if you get a really bad review? Or someone ‘bad mouths’ your business online? What can you do? Here are the five steps to take:
The first piece of advice is; read the review and respond as soon as possible. People sometimes leave a bad review as a knee jerk reaction to what has happened without thinking too much about it. Anger takes over, and because it is now such an easy process, there is no cautionary ‘think before you act’ process involved.
Confronting the reviewer head on usually deflates any anger, and with an offer to resolve or satisfy any problems, this can turn a bad review into a good one. The worst thing is to ignore it completely. It won’t go away, and it may affect a potential customer/client’s decision whether to go with you or not.
That said, another type of ‘bad-mouthing’ may come from a competitor. Saying bad things about you or your business to make them look bigger or better and the best thing to do in these circumstances, is nothing. Put your head down and concentrate on what you do best. This is probably simply a matter of jealousy
2. Identify if it is defamation
Bad reviews and derogatory remarks from competitors is one thing. However, publishing lies in the press or media is something else altogether. And this includes Social Media online. The legal term for this is defamation. Whether it be in writing (libel) or made verbally (slander), such comments that damage or are likely to damage another individual e.g. ‘lowers an individual’s reputation in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally’, potentially may give rise to court action.
Since 2013 when the new Defamation Act came into force, the threshold for bringing such an action has been raised. A potential claimant now has to prove that ‘serious harm’ has been caused to the claimant, and in the case of a profit-making business, ‘serious financial loss’.
3. Comply with the rules
Before going to court, it’s most important that the claimant (you, if you are taking the person who has defamed you to court) should comply with the Civil Procedure Rules (the rules that are followed by the courts and parties in civil court proceedings). This means that s/he must follow ‘pre-action protocols for defamation’.
The first step is to send a ‘letter of claim’ to the potential Defendant. Such a letter is very important to get right. It must contain all the protocol requirements such as the name of the claimant, the words complained of and details identifying the publication/broadcast in which they were contained, the date of publication or copy of the transcript of those words. It should also include facts or matters that clearly identify the claimant from the words and how they were interpreted, as well as the particular damage caused by them. Finally, it should describe the nature of any remedies sought. A paralegal, who will usually charge considerably less than a solicitor, can help you draw up the correct letter and gather the evidence. You will need proof of the slander/libel, proof that the person you are accusing did what you are saying, and proof of the impact it has had on you or your business.
The purpose of a Letter of Claim is to encourage an exchange of information and hopefully early settlement, if possible, without the need to go to court.
A defendant should respond within 14 days, but this may depend on what the letter specifies. The response should cover whether any further information is required and if so, what specific information is required to deal with the claim, to what extent if any, the defendant accepts the claim and what kind of remedy will be offered. If the claim is rejected, then the defendant needs to specify the reasons why and indicate what facts will be relied upon and finally should include what meaning the defendant attributes to the words complained of
4. Try to find a solution outside court
There is a huge emphasis on alternative dispute resolution e.g. the parties are encouraged to find a solution to their dispute by any other means rather than going to court. Besides, taking the final step to litigate (going to court) is a very costly one for both parties. So, if at all possible – find a way to resolve this outside the courtroom.
If you are using the services of a paralegal, then they can help you negotiate with the defendant’s legal representative. You can also ask for mediation – where an independent third party works with both sides to find an acceptable resolution. This may simply involve a retraction, an apology and the deletion of any online content or it may go further and require a financial payment. Ideally you will find a resolution before going to court and it is often worth accepting a lower financial offer than you may feel you ‘deserve’ in order to avoid incurring the costs of a court case. Again, your paralegal will be able to advise you.
5. Going to court
Should there be no resolution, and the only alternative left is to litigate, then it is in the hands of the court. At this point you may need to bring in the services of a Barrister to represent you in court, although more and more these days, judges are allowing paralegals to represent their clients in court – however this is at the discretion of the judge. There is no one size fits all with defamation cases. The courts will look at each case on its merits, so you need to be sure you have all the information and evidence needed before you take this step – and even then you can’t be sure the court will find in your favour. Finally, think about the costs – even if you win the case you may not be awarded damages that cover the time, effort, energy and stress you had to put into winning.
No one likes to let someone who has ‘bad mouthed’ them get away with it – it doesn’t feel fair, but if you can avoid the courts, it’s best to do so, or you may find yourself with a pyrrhic victory that you wish you’d never fought for.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Amanda Hamilton is Chief Executive of the National Association of Licenced Paralegals (NALP), a non-profit Membership Body and the only Paralegal body that is recognised as an awarding organisation by Ofqual (the regulator of qualifications in England). Through its training arm, NALP Training, trading as National Paralegal College, accredited recognised professional paralegal qualifications are offered for a career as a paralegal professional.
See: http://www.nationalparalegals.co.uk and https://www.nalptraining.co.uk/